File #: 24-0544    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Administrative Report Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/25/2024 In control: City Council
On agenda: 7/3/2024 Final action:
Title: RELOCATION OPTIONS FOR THE CORONA DEPOT BUILDING LOCATED AT 150 DEPOT DRIVE
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Corna Depot Building PPT 7-03-2024, 3. Corona Depot Building GIS Pic
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION



DATE: 07/03/2024

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: City Manager's Office

SUBJECT:
Title
RELOCATION OPTIONS FOR THE CORONA DEPOT BUILDING LOCATED AT 150 DEPOT DRIVE

End
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This staff report asks the City Council to provide direction on one of the four options to relocate the Corona Depot Building at 150 Depot Drive.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Recommended action
That the City Council:

a. Provide direction on one of four options to relocate the Corona Depot Building located at 150 Depot Drive.
b. Depending on the option chosen, authorize the creation of new Capital Improvement Project titled, "Corona Depot Building Relocation," authorize an estimated revenue increase up to an amount of $50,000, and an appropriation up to an amount of $500,000 within the General Fund 110.
Body
BACKGROUND & HISTORY:
During the City Council meeting on May 1st, 2024, the City Council and residents expressed support for preserving the Corona Depot building. During that same meeting, the City Council directed the City Manager to have staff research options for relocating the Corona Depot building. At that same meeting, a representative of the owner of the building, Ganahl Lumber, committed to donate $50,000 towards the relocation costs if it was accomplished in a reasonable amount of time.

City staff contacted six (6) building movers to provide options and anticipated costs for moving the building or portions thereof. These efforts resulted in four options for the Council to consider.

ANALYSIS:
Staff contacted six (6) building movers to provide options and cost estimates for moving the building. When provided details about the building (i.e. age of structure, masonry on slab, height, width, length, etc.) only two indicated an ability to do the work. One of the movers was able to inspect the building and provide options and tentative costs. The other was pending approval for the required California lic...

Click here for full text