File #: 18-1910    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearings Status: Passed
File created: 7/3/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 7/18/2018 Final action:
Title: Public Hearing for City Council consideration to adopt Resolution No. 2018-079 confirming the diagram and assessment for Lighting Maintenance District No. 84-1 for Fiscal Year 2018-19.
Attachments: 1. Exhibit A - LMD 84-1 District Diagram, 2. LMD 84-1 Reso 2018-079, 3. LMD 84-1 Final Engineer Report FY 2018-19

AGENDA REPORT

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION

 

 

 

 

 

DATE:                                          7/18/2018

 

TO:                                          Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

                     

FROM:                     Administrative Services Department

 

SUBJECT:                     

Title

Public Hearing for City Council consideration to adopt Resolution No. 2018-079 confirming the diagram and assessment for Lighting Maintenance District No. 84-1 for Fiscal Year 2018-19.

 

End

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Recommended action                     

That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2018-079 confirming the diagram and assessment for Lighting Maintenance District No. 84-1 for Fiscal Year 2018-19.

 

Body

ANALYSIS:

Lighting Maintenance District No. 84-1 (the “District”) was established in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”) in 1984.  The purpose of the District is to provide lighting maintenance and operating services for the streetlights, traffic signals, and related appurtenances within the District’s boundaries.

The District encompasses 3 benefit zones covering approximately 11,288 streetlights, 621 safety lights, and 187 traffic signals and traffic control devices in the City. The City owns and maintains 163 traffic signals; four are jointly owned and maintained with Riverside County; six are jointly-owned with the City of Norco; 16 are California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) owned and jointly-maintained, and two are owned by Riverside County but maintained by the City through the District. Riverside County provides a maintenance reimbursement to the District to cover the cost of County owned signal. Within the District, there are also 24 traffic control devices, including 5 Edison powered Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), 5 Edison powered school beacons, 1 solar/battery powered school beacon and 13 solar/battery powered enhanced crosswalks. The annual assessments proposed to be levied within the District will pay for the energy and maintenance costs of these signals and devices during Fiscal Year 2018-19.

 

The State of California Street and Highways Code Section 22500 requires an annual review of the assessments levied by the assessment districts formed under the 1972 Act. In order to levy and collect special assessments within the districts, Engineer's Reports must be prepared, which provide details on the improvements that are maintained and the estimated budgets for the District.

 

On May 16, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolutions No. 2018-026, to initiate the proceedings to levy and collect assessments for the District for Fiscal Year 2018-19, appointed Spicer Consulting Group, LLC as the engineer of record, and ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for the District.

On June 6, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-032, to declare the City’s intention to levy and collect assessments within the District, approve the preliminary Engineer’s Report (the “Preliminary Report”), and provide notice of public hearing on the proposed assessments.  Notice of public hearing was published in the local newspaper on June 13, 2018.

Attached is the final Engineer’s (the “Report”) for the District, which is consistent with the Preliminary Report.  The Report includes a detailed description of the existing improvements within the District, the estimated maintenance costs, the method of assessment apportionment for each lot or parcel within the District boundaries, and a diagram showing the boundaries of the District (and zone).  The Report also provides an analysis of the District’s financial status.

Adoption of the recommended resolution is the last step of the annual proceedings for the levy and collection of special assessment within the District.  The City Council will conduct a public hearing to afford all interested parties an opportunity to make verbal or written comments on the proposed annual assessment.  At the conclusion of the hearing, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the said resolution confirming the diagram and assessments for the District for Fiscal Year 2018-19, which will constitute the levy of the assessment for the maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities within the District, in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code.

 

COMMITTEE ACTION:

Not Applicable.

 

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item supports the City’s Strategic Plan Goal 6: Improve Communications with Our Community; Objective a: Commit to transparency in all City actions.  The recommended action will help achieve these goals by providing concise, forthright information regarding the annual levy proceedings for the District.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost of construction, installation, operation, servicing and maintenance of the District will be funded by the assessments levied and collected within the District.  For Fiscal Year 2018-19, it is projected that the current year assessment revenue will be insufficient to cover the operating costs during the same fiscal period, resulting in an operating deficit of $394,605, which will be covered by a one-time contribution from the Districts operating reserves. The District completed replacing the high-pressure sodium lights with the more energy efficient LED in April 2018, which will result in reduction of operating costs in future years.  

Below is an overview of the District’s estimated assessment revenues and proposed expenditures for Fiscal Year 2018-19.  Detailed information per zone can be found in the attached Report.

District

Estimated Cost

Estimated Assessment Revenue

General Benefit Contribution(1)

Estimated Excess/(Deficit)

Contribution (To)/From Operating Reserve

Contribution (To)/From Capital Reserve

Operating Reserve(2)

Capital Reserve(3)

LMD 84-1

$2,539,565

$2,038,934

$106,026

$(394,605)

$394,605

$0

$21,246

$0

 

(1)                     Benefit received by non-residents of the District for the major/arterial streetlights, traffic signals, traffic control devices and landscape improvements.  This amount is contributed by the City’s General Fund.

(2)                     The Operating Reserve fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services.

(3)                     The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects.  All existing improvement in the District have finite life expectancies and will require replacement at some point in the future.  On an annual basis, any non-expended assessment monies, in excess of Operating Reserve contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient funds to pay for the needed replacement, or respond to unforeseen capital improvement needs.

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.  Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the action is not subject to CEQA.  This action merely declares the City’s intent to levy and collect assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2018-19, and there is no possibility that adopting the resolution will have a significant effect on the environment.

 

 

PREPARED BY: LIEN-CHI CANTUBA, FINANCIAL ANALYST III

 

REVIEWED BY: KERRY D. EDEN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR

 

REVIEWED BY: MICHELE NISSEN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

 

SUBMITTED BY: DARRELL TALBERT, CITY MANAGER

 

Exhibit A - LMD 84-1 District Diagram