File #: 18-2306    Version: 2 Name:
Type: Public Hearings Status: Passed
File created: 11/15/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/20/2018 Final action:
Title: Public Hearing for City Council consideration of Resolution No. 2018-125 revising the Citywide Master Fee Recovery Schedule and Recovery Percentages (excluding building fees) and repealing Resolution Nos. 2014-003, 2015-068, 2016-097, 2017-020, 2017-101, and 2018-023.
Attachments: 1. 18-2306 Staff Report, 2. 18-2306 Staff Report with Attachments, 3. City of Corona Council presentation 11.20.2018_v2 (002)
AGENDA REPORT
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION




DATE: 11/20/2018

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Administrative Services Department

SUBJECT:
Title
Public Hearing for City Council consideration of Resolution No. 2018-125 revising the Citywide Master Fee Recovery Schedule and Recovery Percentages (excluding building fees) and repealing Resolution Nos. 2014-003, 2015-068, 2016-097, 2017-020, 2017-101, and 2018-023.

End
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Recommended action
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2018-125 revising the Citywide Master Fee Recovery Schedule and Recovery Percentages (excluding building fees) and repealing Resolution Nos. 2014-003, 2015-068, 2016-097, 2017-020, 2017-101, and 2018-023.

Body
ANALYSIS:
The last comprehensive review and update of all City user fees was completed in 2015. Typically, these studies are completed every two years to reflect the impact of inflation and other cost changes and updates to the structure for providing City services. Due to the 2017 implementation of TrakIT, the City's new permitting system, the City elected to postpone the full fee update for one year. On January 8, 2018, Request for Proposals (RFP) 18-023WY Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) and Fee Study was posted on the City's website and sent to seven known firms that provide CAP and Fee Study services.

Four (4) proposals were received by the January 30, 2018 due date and subsequently reviewed by a panel of City staff. Evaluation of the proposals was based on five criteria: 1) Qualifications of Firm, 2) Qualifications of Personnel, 3) Related Experience, 4) Completeness and Timeliness of Response and 5) Competitive Cost and Price. MGT Consulting Group (MGT) scored the highest of the four firms. The following is a summary of the proposals received and scoring results:




Rank
Firm
Location|1010|MGT Consulting Group
Sacramento, CA|1010|Willdan
Temecula, CA|1010|Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
Fullerton, CA|1010|Matri...

Click here for full text